Conclusions

The circuit as a whole was certainly very challenging. Creating a working simulation was particularly difficult, compounded by the fact that many components found in Psched were not actually modeled. The analysis of the circuit by hand was perhaps even more difficult, with the complexity of the equations requiring careful coding in Matlab to solve and graph. By far the most difficult procedure for the process, however, was the hardware implementation. No matter what we tried, nothing worked on the first try. More importantly, it was not possible to achieve the correct output voltage. In order to achieve functionality, we reduced the input voltage from 24V to 6V so as to reduce the input current and find a solution that was able to be realized in the lab. Woefully, the frequency we used along with the components chosen did not function as we had planned. Rather than a -12V at the output, we only were able to achieve a -3V at best and more consistently, -2.5V. The circuit is well on its way to realization but due to restrictions on variables such as time and components, we were unable to realize the complete functionality of the circuit we had originally set out to build. The testing seems very feasible as we learned through research, but future work would be required on our converter before a second, Pb free prototype can be built.

Related Links: ECE164 Groups:

Project:

 

ECE164 Main Site

Contact Us

Pratt School of Engineering